You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of specific calcitonin-like receptor residues important for calcitonin gene-related peptide high affinity binding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pharmacology, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2210-6-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sugato Banerjee, Janel Evanson, Erik Harris, Stephen L Lowe, Kathryn A Thomasson, James E Porter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,288,634
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology
#8
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,961
of 64,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them