You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In silico tandem affinity purification refines an Oct4 interaction list
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt67 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clara Yujing Cheong, Patricia Miang Lon Ng, Rhonda Ponnampalam, Heng-Hang Tsai, Guillaume Bourque, Thomas Lufkin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 31% |
| Researcher | 7 | 27% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#760
of 2,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,882
of 110,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.