↓ Skip to main content

Local knowledge about fodder plants in the semi-arid region of Northeastern Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local knowledge about fodder plants in the semi-arid region of Northeastern Brazil
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-11-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alissandra Trajano Nunes, Reinaldo Farias Paivade Lucena, Mércia Virgínia Ferreira dos Santos, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

Abstract

This study evaluated local knowledge of the fodder plants of the Caatinga in northeast Brazil (seasonal dry forest). Specifically, the goal was to catalog local knowledge regarding the use of native and exotic forage plants in two rural communities located in the state of Paraíba (northeast Brazil), to provide information for nutritional investigations and to verify how the knowledge of these resources is distributed. The communities were followed for three consecutive years, and interviews were conducted with 44 families (20 men and 24 women). Nine of these individuals were determined by the snowball technique to be key informants who held more specific knowledge about the topic. The data were structured into a database and statistically analyzed. Overall, 136 plants from 37 families and 113 genera were cited, and the knowledge of men was at a higher level than that of women (p < 0.05). Participants demonstrated a sophisticated knowledge of nutritional characteristics such as nutritional value, palatability, availability and productivity. Native plants were highlighted over the exotic, especially for species of the families Cactaceae, Bromeliaceae and Fabaceae. The great diversity of plants cited by the informants demonstrates the potential of local vegetation and the importance of traditional knowledge in the research process and in the characterization of forage resources. This diversity also favors the selection of promising species for future biotechnological investigations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 9 7%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 34%
Environmental Science 13 11%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 40 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,016,166
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#139
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,248
of 357,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.