↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28-coated beads with soluble anti-CD3 for expanding human T cells: Differing impact on CD8 T cell phenotype and responsiveness to restimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
442 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28-coated beads with soluble anti-CD3 for expanding human T cells: Differing impact on CD8 T cell phenotype and responsiveness to restimulation
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-8-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yixin Li, Roger J Kurlander

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Unknown 432 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 24%
Researcher 95 21%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 43 10%
Unknown 81 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 85 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 9%
Engineering 21 5%
Other 43 10%
Unknown 86 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,759,510
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#783
of 4,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,093
of 100,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.