↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28-coated beads with soluble anti-CD3 for expanding human T cells: Differing impact on CD8 T cell phenotype and responsiveness to restimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28-coated beads with soluble anti-CD3 for expanding human T cells: Differing impact on CD8 T cell phenotype and responsiveness to restimulation
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-8-104
Authors

Yixin Li, Roger J Kurlander

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 366 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 26%
Researcher 84 22%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 59 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 75 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 10%
Engineering 18 5%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 63 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,107,103
of 20,303,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#656
of 3,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,393
of 295,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,303,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them