You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discarding duplicate ditags in LongSAGE analysis may introduce significant error
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-8-92 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeppe Emmersen, Anna M Heidenblut, Annabeth Laursen Høgh, Stephan A Hahn, Karen G Welinder, Kåre L Nielsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 9% |
Nigeria | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,737,238
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,084
of 7,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,550
of 76,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.