↓ Skip to main content

Reverse genetics in Chlamydomonas: a platform for isolating insertional mutants

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reverse genetics in Chlamydomonas: a platform for isolating insertional mutants
Published in
Plant Methods, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-7-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Gonzalez-Ballester, Wirulda Pootakham, Florence Mus, Wenqiang Yang, Claudia Catalanotti, Leonardo Magneschi, Amaury de Montaigu, Jose J Higuera, Matthew Prior, Aurora Galván, Emilio Fernandez, Arthur R Grossman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 141 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 26%
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Professor 9 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 16 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2014.
All research outputs
#4,227,278
of 14,013,582 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#247
of 626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,764
of 276,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,013,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them