You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reverse genetics in Chlamydomonas: a platform for isolating insertional mutants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-7-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Gonzalez-Ballester, Wirulda Pootakham, Florence Mus, Wenqiang Yang, Claudia Catalanotti, Leonardo Magneschi, Amaury de Montaigu, Jose J Higuera, Matthew Prior, Aurora Galván, Emilio Fernandez, Arthur R Grossman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 25% |
| Researcher | 35 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,550,598
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#510
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,539
of 120,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them