You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of two high through-put techniques in a novel application: detecting point mutations in large EMS mutated plant populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-5-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine LF Gady, Freddy WK Hermans, Marion HBJ Van de Wal, Eibertus N van Loo, Richard GF Visser, Christian WB Bachem |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#339
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,641
of 110,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them