↓ Skip to main content

Protein recovery from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli using mild solubilization process

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1773 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein recovery from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli using mild solubilization process
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12934-015-0222-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anupam Singh, Vaibhav Upadhyay, Arun Kumar Upadhyay, Surinder Mohan Singh, Amulya Kumar Panda

Abstract

Formation of inclusion bodies in bacterial hosts poses a major challenge for large scale recovery of bioactive proteins. The process of obtaining bioactive protein from inclusion bodies is labor intensive and the yields of recombinant protein are often low. Here we review the developments in the field that are targeted at improving the yield, as well as quality of the recombinant protein by optimizing the individual steps of the process, especially solubilization of the inclusion bodies and refolding of the solubilized protein. Mild solubilization methods have been discussed which are based on the understanding of the fact that protein molecules in inclusion body aggregates have native-like structure. These methods solubilize the inclusion body aggregates while preserving the native-like protein structure. Subsequent protein refolding and purification results in high recovery of bioactive protein. Other parameters which influence the overall recovery of bioactive protein from inclusion bodies have also been discussed. A schematic model describing the utility of mild solubilization methods for high throughput recovery of bioactive protein has also been presented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,773 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 1770 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 348 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 316 18%
Student > Master 272 15%
Researcher 164 9%
Student > Postgraduate 56 3%
Other 150 8%
Unknown 467 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 692 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 273 15%
Chemistry 76 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 55 3%
Engineering 44 2%
Other 143 8%
Unknown 490 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,764,764
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#99
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,685
of 264,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.