↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial factors and their role in chronic pain: A brief review of development and current status

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial factors and their role in chronic pain: A brief review of development and current status
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, April 2005
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-13-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanley I Innes

Abstract

The belief that pain is a direct result of tissue damage has dominated medical thinking since the mid 20th Century. Several schools of psychological thought proffered linear causal models to explain non-physical pain observations such as phantom limb pain and the effects of placebo interventions. Psychological research has focused on identifying those people with acute pain who are at risk of transitioning into chronic and disabling pain, in the hope of producing better outcomes.Several multicausal Cognitive Behavioural models dominate the research landscape in this area. They are gaining wider acceptance and some aspects are being integrated and implemented into a number of health care systems. The most notable of these is the concept of Yellow Flags. The research to validate the veracity of such programs has not yet been established.In this paper I seek to briefly summarize the development of psychological thought, both past and present, then review current cognitive-behavioural models and the available supporting evidence. I conclude by discussing these factors and identifying those that have been shown to be reliable predictors of chronicity and those that may hold promise for the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 25%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 18%
Psychology 19 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 23 17%