You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Silica-based cationic bilayers as immunoadjuvants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-9-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nilton Lincopan, Mariana RA Santana, Eliana Faquim-Mauro, Maria Helena B da Costa, Ana M Carmona-Ribeiro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Professor | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 31% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#428
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,892
of 171,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.