↓ Skip to main content

Improved motion correction using image registration based on variational synthetic image estimation: application to inline t1 mapping of myocardium

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved motion correction using image registration based on variational synthetic image estimation: application to inline t1 mapping of myocardium
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-13-s1-p21
Authors

Hui Xue, Saurabh Shah, Andreas Greiser, Christoph Guetter, Christophe Chefdhotel, Sven Zuehlsdorff, Jens Guerhing, Peter Kellman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Spain 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 54%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 69%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#715
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,060
of 193,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.