↓ Skip to main content

Targeting accuracy and impact of a community-identified waiver card scheme for primary care user fees in Afghanistan

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting accuracy and impact of a community-identified waiver card scheme for primary care user fees in Afghanistan
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-9-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura C Steinhardt, David H Peters

Abstract

User fees are a known common barrier to using health services, particularly among the poor. When fees are present, many facilities have waiver systems for poor patients to exempt them from paying. Targeting waivers to patients who need them most has been a challenge, especially in fragile states, where relevant data are limited and trust in institutions is low.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 35%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#709
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,982
of 190,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.