You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the effects of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethyl cellulose barrier on ovarian tumor progression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ovarian Research, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-2215-7-40 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laetitia Picaud, Benoît Thibault, Eliane Mery, Monia Ouali, Alejandra Martinez, Jean-Pierre Delord, Bettina Couderc, Gwenael Ferron |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 32% |
| Engineering | 4 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,054,522
of 23,989,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ovarian Research
#80
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,284
of 206,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ovarian Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them