You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-3-66 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vikki Wylde, Ian D Learmonth, Victoria J Cavendish |
| Abstract |
In the last 25 years, assessment of orthopaedic intervention has become patient focused, with the development of self-completion patient-centred outcome measures. The Oxford hip score (OHS) is a joint specific outcome measure tool designed to assess disability in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR). Although the psychometric properties of the OHS have been rigorously examined, there is little research on the patient's perspective of the OHS. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess whether the OHS is an adequate disability measure from the patient's perspective using qualitative analysis of annotations written on the OHS by patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 16% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#838
of 2,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,911
of 60,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.