You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
PET-Tool: a software suite for comprehensive processing and managing of Paired-End diTag (PET) sequence data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-7-390 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kuo Ping Chiu, Chee-Hong Wong, Qiongyu Chen, Pramila Ariyaratne, Hong Sain Ooi, Chia-Lin Wei, Wing-Kin Ken Sung, Yijun Ruan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
Professor | 6 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 58% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,699,921
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,062
of 7,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,455
of 67,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.