You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
IgCAMs redundantly control axon navigation in Caenorhabditis elegans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neural Development, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8104-4-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentin Schwarz, Jie Pan, Susanne Voltmer-Irsch, Harald Hutter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 29% |
| Researcher | 17 | 27% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#67
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,168
of 94,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.