You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proteomic assessment of a cell model of spinal muscular atrophy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-12-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chia-Yen Wu, Dosh Whye, Lisa Glazewski, Leila Choe, Douglas Kerr, Kelvin H Lee, Robert W Mason, Wenlan Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 12% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#376
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,635
of 109,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.