You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of five different cDNA labeling methods for microarrays using spike controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, December 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-3-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Azadeh Badiee, Hans Geir Eiken, Vidar M Steen, Roger Løvlie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 52% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#461
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,250
of 143,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.