You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of liquid stimuli on dual-axis swallowing accelerometry signals in a healthy population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-9-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joon Lee, Ervin Sejdić, Catriona M Steele, Tom Chau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,563,555
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#138
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,138
of 175,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.