You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of fluorescence enhancement to improve the microscopic diagnosis of falciparum malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-6-89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Guy, Paul Liu, Peter Pennefather, Ian Crandall |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,880,234
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,300
of 5,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,348
of 69,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.