↓ Skip to main content

The normal development of Platynereis dumerilii (Nereididae, Annelida)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The normal development of Platynereis dumerilii (Nereididae, Annelida)
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-7-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antje HL Fischer, Thorsten Henrich, Detlev Arendt

Abstract

The polychaete annelid Platynereis dumerilii is an emerging model organism for the study of molecular developmental processes, evolution, neurobiology and marine biology. Annelids belong to the Lophotrochozoa, the so far understudied third major branch of bilaterian animals besides deuterostomes and ecdysozoans. P. dumerilii has proven highly relevant to explore ancient bilaterian conditions via comparison to the deuterostomes, because it has accumulated less evolutionary change than conventional ecdysozoan models. Previous staging was mainly referring to hours post fertilization but did not allow matching stages between studies performed at (even slightly) different temperatures. To overcome this, and to provide a first comprehensive description of P. dumerilii normal development, a temperature-independent staging system is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 243 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 17%
Researcher 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 54 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 19%
Environmental Science 10 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 58 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,223,637
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#133
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,103
of 190,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them