You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combined expectancies: electrophysiological evidence for the adjustment of expectancy effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-7-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Uwe Mattler, Arie van der Lugt, Thomas F Münte |
| Abstract |
When subjects use cues to prepare for a likely stimulus or a likely response, reaction times are facilitated by valid cues but prolonged by invalid cues. In studies on combined expectancy effects, two cues can independently give information regarding two dimensions of the forthcoming task. In certain situations, cueing effects on one dimension are reduced when the cue on the other dimension is invalid. According to the Adjusted Expectancy Model, cues affect different processing levels and a mechanism is presumed which is sensitive to the validity of early level cues and leads to online adjustment of expectancy effects at later levels. To examine the predictions of this model cueing of stimulus modality was combined with response cueing. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 60% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2009.
All research outputs
#8,234,011
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#384
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,397
of 72,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.