↓ Skip to main content

Early transplantation of human immature dental pulp stem cells from baby teeth to golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dogs: Local or systemic?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early transplantation of human immature dental pulp stem cells from baby teeth to golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dogs: Local or systemic?
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2008
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-6-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irina Kerkis, Carlos E Ambrosio, Alexandre Kerkis, Daniele S Martins, Eder Zucconi, Simone AS Fonseca, Rosa M Cabral, Carlos MC Maranduba, Thais P Gaiad, Adriana C Morini, Natassia M Vieira, Marina P Brolio, Osvaldo A Sant'Anna, Maria A Miglino, Mayana Zatz

Abstract

The golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dogs represent the best available animal model for therapeutic trials aiming at the future treatment of human Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We have obtained a rare litter of six GRMD dogs (3 males and 3 females) born from an affected male and a carrier female which were submitted to a therapeutic trial with adult human stem cells to investigate their capacity to engraft into dogs muscles by local as compared to systemic injection without any immunosuppression.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 34 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2010.
All research outputs
#3,807,924
of 12,942,334 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#620
of 2,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,230
of 278,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#19
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,942,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.