↓ Skip to main content

Terrestrial invasion of pomatiopsid gastropods in the heavy-snow region of the Japanese Archipelago

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
38 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Terrestrial invasion of pomatiopsid gastropods in the heavy-snow region of the Japanese Archipelago
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuichi Kameda, Makoto Kato

Abstract

Gastropod mollusks are one of the most successful animals that have diversified in the fully terrestrial habitat. They have evolved terrestrial taxa in more than nine lineages, most of which originated during the Paleozoic or Mesozoic. The rissooidean gastropod family Pomatiopsidae is one of the few groups that have evolved fully terrestrial taxa during the late Cenozoic. The pomatiopsine diversity is particularly high in the Japanese Archipelago and the terrestrial taxa occur only in this region. In this study, we conducted thorough samplings of Japanese pomatiopsid species and performed molecular phylogenetic analyses to explore the patterns of diversification and terrestrial invasion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 56%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 10%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,838,512
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,215
of 3,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,711
of 122,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#14
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.