↓ Skip to main content

Canine and feline cardiopulmonary parasitic nematodes in Europe: emerging and underestimated

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Canine and feline cardiopulmonary parasitic nematodes in Europe: emerging and underestimated
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-3-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donato Traversa, Angela Di Cesare, Gary Conboy

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary nematodes of dogs and cats cause parasitic diseases of central relevance in current veterinary practice. In the recent past the distribution of canine and feline heartworms and lungworms has increased in various geographical areas, including Europe. This is true especially for the metastrongyloids Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, Angiostrongylus vasorum and Crenosoma vulpis, the filarioid Dirofilaria immitis and the trichuroid Eucoleus aerophilus (syn. Capillaria aerophila). The reasons of this emergence are little known but many drivers such as global warming, changes in vector epidemiology and movements in animal populations, may be taken into account. The purpose of this article is to review the knowledge of the most important heartworm and lungworm infections of dogs and cats in Europe. In particular recent advances in epidemiology, clinical and control are described and discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 18%
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Other 17 8%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 50 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 78 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 59 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,776
of 5,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,648
of 104,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.