↓ Skip to main content

Complete mitochondrial genome of Bugula neritina (Bryozoa, Gymnolaemata, Cheilostomata): phylogenetic position of Bryozoa and phylogeny of lophophorates within the Lophotrochozoa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complete mitochondrial genome of Bugula neritina (Bryozoa, Gymnolaemata, Cheilostomata): phylogenetic position of Bryozoa and phylogeny of lophophorates within the Lophotrochozoa
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-10-167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuem Hee Jang, Ui Wook Hwang

Abstract

The phylogenetic position of Bryozoa is one of the most controversial issues in metazoan phylogeny. In an attempt to address this issue, the first bryozoan mitochondrial genome from Flustrellidra hispida (Gymnolaemata, Ctenostomata) was recently sequenced and characterized. Unfortunately, it has extensive gene translocation and extremely reduced size. In addition, the phylogenies obtained from the result were conflicting, so they failed to assign a reliable phylogenetic position to Bryozoa or to clarify lophophorate phylogeny. Thus, it is necessary to characterize further mitochondrial genomes from slowly-evolving bryozoans to obtain a more credible lophophorate phylogeny.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 5%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Brazil 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 59%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,907
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,658
of 106,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#18
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.