↓ Skip to main content

Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-7-246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke B Chenoweth, Simon M Tierney, Jaclyn A Smith, Steven JB Cooper, Michael P Schwarz

Abstract

The major lineages of eusocial insects, the ants, termites, stingless bees, honeybees and vespid wasps, all have ancient origins (> or = 65 mya) with no reversions to solitary behaviour. This has prompted the notion of a 'point of no return' whereby the evolutionary elaboration and integration of behavioural, genetic and morphological traits over a very long period of time leads to a situation where reversion to solitary living is no longer an evolutionary option.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 3%
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 70%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,950
of 167,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.