↓ Skip to main content

BMC Surgery reviewer acknowledgement, 2014

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BMC Surgery reviewer acknowledgement, 2014
Published in
BMC Surgery, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-15-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangde Tu

Abstract

The editors of BMC Surgery would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed their time to the journal in Volume 14 (2014).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,746,536
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#519
of 1,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,856
of 358,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.