↓ Skip to main content

Correlation between mutational status and survival and second cancer risk assessment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlation between mutational status and survival and second cancer risk assessment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a population-based study
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12957-015-0474-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordi Rubió-Casadevall, Joan Borràs, Maria Carmona-García, Alberto Ameijide, Allan Gonzalez-Vidal, Maria Ortiz, Ramon Bosch, Francesc Riu, David Parada, Esther Martí, Josefina Miró, Juan Sirvent, Jaume Galceran, Rafael Marcos-Gragera

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are sarcomas of the digestive tract characterized by mutations mainly located in the c-KIT or in the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-alpha genes. Mutations in the BRAF gene have also been described. Our purpose is to define the distribution of c-KIT, PDGFR and BRAF mutations in a population-based cohort of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) patients and correlate them with anatomical site, risk classification and survival. In addition, as most of the GIST patients have a long survival, second cancers are frequently diagnosed in them. We performed a second primary cancer risk assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Librarian 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 63%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,801,479
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#516
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,892
of 352,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#33
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.