You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antibiotic repeat prescriptions: are patients not re-filling them properly?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40545-014-0017-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iman Zayegh, Theresa L Charrois, Jeffery Hughes, Kreshnik Hoti |
Abstract |
This study aimed to explore patients' utilization of repeat prescriptions for antibiotics indicated in upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). An emphasis was placed on whether the current system of repeat prescriptions contributes to patients self-diagnosing infections and if so, identify the common reasons for this. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
Researcher | 3 | 19% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,215,554
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#263
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,464
of 354,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.