↓ Skip to main content

Electrochemical and optical biosensors for early-stage cancer diagnosis by using graphene and graphene oxide

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Nanotechnology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 166)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrochemical and optical biosensors for early-stage cancer diagnosis by using graphene and graphene oxide
Published in
Cancer Nanotechnology, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12645-017-0035-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aditya Balaji, Jin Zhang

Abstract

Conventional instruments for cancer diagnosis including magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scan, are expensive and require long-waiting time, whilst the outcomes have not approached to the successful early-stage diagnosis yet. Due to the special properties of graphene-based nanocomposites, e.g., good electrical and thermal conductivity, luminescence, and mechanic flexibility, these ultra-thin two-dimensional nanostructures have been extensively used as platforms for detecting biomolecules and cells. Herein, we discuss the development of two types of graphene and graphene oxide-based biosensors: electrochemical and optical, aimed for tumor detection and early diagnosis of cancer. Moreover, we highlight the challenges of their use as biosensors for cancer detection. Efficient surface modification and suitable bio-conjugation of graphene and graphene oxide is discussed, including key role in improvement of the biocompatibility, and improved performance in terms of selectivity and sensitivity towards the early diagnosis of cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 18%
Chemistry 14 14%
Materials Science 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Nanotechnology
#39
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,716
of 440,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Nanotechnology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.