↓ Skip to main content

Participatory testing and reporting in an environmental-justice community of Worcester, Massachusetts: a pilot project

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participatory testing and reporting in an environmental-justice community of Worcester, Massachusetts: a pilot project
Published in
Environmental Health, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-9-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy J Downs, Laurie Ross, Danielle Mucciarone, Maria-Camila Calvache, Octavia Taylor, Robert Goble

Abstract

Despite indoor home environments being where people spend most time, involving residents in testing those environments has been very limited, especially in marginalized communities. We piloted participatory testing and reporting that combined relatively simple tests with actionable reporting to empower residents in Main South/Piedmont neighborhoods of Worcester, Massachusetts. We answered: 1) How do we design and implement the approach for neighborhood and household environments using participatory methods? 2) What do pilot tests reveal? 3) How does our experience inform testing practice?

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 16%
Social Sciences 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2011.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#821
of 1,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,695
of 94,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.