↓ Skip to main content

Hunting strategies used in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hunting strategies used in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-5-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rômulo RN Alves, Lívia ET Mendonça, Maine VA Confessor, Washington LS Vieira, Luiz CS Lopez

Abstract

Hunting for wild animals is stimulated by the many different human uses of faunal resources, and these animals constitute important subsistence items in local communities in the Caatinga region. In order to gain access to these resources, hunters have developed a series of techniques and strategies that are described in the present work. The principal hunting techniques encountered were: waiting, especially directed towards hunting diurnal birds; calling ("arremedo"), a technique in which the hunters imitate the animal's call to attract it to close range; hunting with dogs, a technique mostly used for capturing mammals; tracking, a technique used by only a few hunters who can recognize and follow animal tracks; and "facheado", in which the hunters go out at night with lanterns to catch birds in their nests. Additionally, many animal species are captured using mechanical traps. The types of traps used by the interviewees were: dead-fall traps ("quixó"), iron-jaw snap traps ("arataca"), wooden cages with bait ("arapuca"), iron-cage traps ("gaiola'), "visgo", multi-compartment bird cages ("alçapão"), buried ground traps with pivoted tops ("fojo"), and nooses and cages for carnivorous. The choice of which technique to use depends on the habits of the species being hunted, indicating that the hunters possess a wide knowledge of the biology of these animals. From a conservation perspective, active hunting techniques (waiting, imitation, hunting with dogs, and "facheado") have the greatest impact on the local fauna. The use of firearm and dogs brought greater efficiency to hunting activities. Additional studies concerning these hunting activities will be useful to contribute to proposals for management plans regulating hunting in the region - with the objective of attaining sustainable use of faunal resources of great importance to the local human communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 14 5%
Argentina 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 250 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 25%
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 50%
Environmental Science 42 16%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 51 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,280,453
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#230
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,627
of 93,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.