↓ Skip to main content

Meteorologically estimated exposure but not distance predicts asthma symptoms in schoolchildren in the environs of a petrochemical refinery: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meteorologically estimated exposure but not distance predicts asthma symptoms in schoolchildren in the environs of a petrochemical refinery: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Environmental Health, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-8-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil White, Jim teWaterNaude, Anita van der Walt, Grant Ravenscroft, Wesley Roberts, Rodney Ehrlich

Abstract

Community concern about asthma prompted an epidemiological study of children living near a petrochemical refinery in Cape Town, South Africa. Because of resource constraints and the complexity of refinery emissions, neither direct environmental measurements nor modelling of airborne pollutants was possible. Instead a meteorologically derived exposure metric was calculated with the refinery as the putative point source. The study aimed to determine whether (1) asthma symptom prevalences were elevated compared to comparable areas in Cape Town and (2) whether there was an association between asthma symptom prevalences and the derived exposure metric.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 10%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 19 18%