↓ Skip to main content

Genes do not read DSM-IV: implications for psychosis classification

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genes do not read DSM-IV: implications for psychosis classification
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1744-859x-7-s1-s68
Authors

Nick Stefanis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Student > Postgraduate 3 20%
Lecturer 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#182
of 510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,379
of 81,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.