↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of the paralytic shellfish toxin biosynthesis gene clusters in Anabaena circinalis AWQC131C and Aphanizomenon sp. NH-5

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterisation of the paralytic shellfish toxin biosynthesis gene clusters in Anabaena circinalis AWQC131C and Aphanizomenon sp. NH-5
Published in
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2091-10-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Troco K Mihali, Ralf Kellmann, Brett A Neilan

Abstract

Saxitoxin and its analogues collectively known as the paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) are neurotoxic alkaloids and are the cause of the syndrome named paralytic shellfish poisoning. PSTs are produced by a unique biosynthetic pathway, which involves reactions that are rare in microbial metabolic pathways. Nevertheless, distantly related organisms such as dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria appear to produce these toxins using the same pathway. Hypothesised explanations for such an unusual phylogenetic distribution of this shared uncommon metabolic pathway, include a polyphyletic origin, an involvement of symbiotic bacteria, and horizontal gene transfer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 13%
Chemistry 17 12%
Environmental Science 15 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#138
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,408
of 108,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.