↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the impact of tuberculosis interventions on epidemiologic outcomes and health system costs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the impact of tuberculosis interventions on epidemiologic outcomes and health system costs
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1480-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivia Oxlade, Amy Piatek, Cheri Vincent, Dick Menzies

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) programs must invest in a variety of TB specific activities in order to reach ambitious global targets. Uncertainty exists surrounding the potential impact of each of these activities. The objective of our study was to model different interventions and quantify their impact on epidemiologic outcomes and costs from the health system perspective. Decision analysis was used to define the TB patient trajectory within the health system of three different countries. We considered up to seven different interventions that could affect either the natural history of TB, or patient trajectories within the health system. The expected impact of interventions were derived from published studies where possible. Epidemiologic outcomes and associated health system costs were projected for each scenario. With no specific intervention, TB related death rates are high and less than 10% of the population starts on correct treatment. Interventions that either prevent cases or affect all patients with TB disease early in their trajectory are expected to have the biggest impact, regardless of underlying epidemiologic characteristics of the setting. In settings with a private sector, improving diagnosis and appropriate treatment across all sectors is expected to have a major impact on outcomes. In all settings, the greatest benefit will come from early diagnosis of all forms of TB. Once this has been achieved more specific interventions, such as those targeting HIV, drug resistance or the private sector can be integrated to increase impact.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 96 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Mathematics 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,427,997
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,537
of 14,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,065
of 358,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#138
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.