↓ Skip to main content

Comparative genomics of the bacterial genus Listeria: Genome evolution is characterized by limited gene acquisition and limited gene loss

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative genomics of the bacterial genus Listeria: Genome evolution is characterized by limited gene acquisition and limited gene loss
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henk C den Bakker, Craig A Cummings, Vania Ferreira, Paolo Vatta, Renato H Orsi, Lovorka Degoricija, Melissa Barker, Olga Petrauskene, Manohar R Furtado, Martin Wiedmann

Abstract

The bacterial genus Listeria contains pathogenic and non-pathogenic species, including the pathogens L. monocytogenes and L. ivanovii, both of which carry homologous virulence gene clusters such as the prfA cluster and clusters of internalin genes. Initial evidence for multiple deletions of the prfA cluster during the evolution of Listeria indicates that this genus provides an interesting model for studying the evolution of virulence and also presents practical challenges with regard to definition of pathogenic strains.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 278 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 25%
Researcher 67 22%
Student > Master 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Professor 17 6%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 36 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 162 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 41 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,597
of 10,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,102
of 180,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#30
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.