↓ Skip to main content

Statistical analysis of an RNA titration series evaluates microarray precision and sensitivity on a whole-array basis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical analysis of an RNA titration series evaluates microarray precision and sensitivity on a whole-array basis
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-7-511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J Holloway, Alicia Oshlack, Dileepa S Diyagama, David DL Bowtell, Gordon K Smyth

Abstract

Concerns are often raised about the accuracy of microarray technologies and the degree of cross-platform agreement, but there are yet no methods which can unambiguously evaluate precision and sensitivity for these technologies on a whole-array basis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 10%
United States 2 5%
France 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 33 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Student > Master 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Mathematics 4 10%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,023
of 7,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,436
of 155,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#15
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.