↓ Skip to main content

23 years of the discovery of Helicobacter pylori: Is the debate over?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 682)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
54 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
23 years of the discovery of Helicobacter pylori: Is the debate over?
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, October 2005
DOI 10.1186/1476-0711-4-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niyaz Ahmed

Abstract

The Gram negative curved bacillus H. pylori has become the prize bug of all times. Barry Marshall and Robin Warren the two discoverers of this organism have been awarded with this year's Nobel Prize. The Nobel committee at the Karolinska Institute of Sweden has selected this paradigm shift discovery of 1982 as the most impacting in medical sciences. This award has surprised many as the Nobel assembly has selected this 'Robert Koch styled medical detective work' for the prize as compared to many outstanding basic research stories on the waitlist. This editorial briefly touches the significant impact of H. pylori on gastroduodenal management and the path forward as the bug has become quite controversial in recent times.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 191 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 60 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#480,667
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#6
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#587
of 77,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them