↓ Skip to main content

Classification, diagnosis and potential mechanisms in Pontocerebellar Hypoplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classification, diagnosis and potential mechanisms in Pontocerebellar Hypoplasia
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-6-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasmin Namavar, Peter G Barth, Bwee Tien Poll-The, Frank Baas

Abstract

Pontocerebellar Hypoplasia (PCH) is group of very rare, inherited progressive neurodegenerative disorders with prenatal onset. Up to now seven different subtypes have been reported (PCH1-7). The incidence of each subtype is unknown. All subtypes share common characteristics, including hypoplasia/atrophy of cerebellum and pons, progressive microcephaly, and variable cerebral involvement. Patients have severe cognitive and motor handicaps and seizures are often reported. Treatment is only symptomatic and prognosis is poor, as most patients die during infancy or childhood. The genetic basis of different subtypes has been elucidated, which makes prenatal testing possible in families with mutations. Mutations in three tRNA splicing endonuclease subunit genes were found to be responsible for PCH2, PCH4 and PCH5. Mutations in the nuclear encoded mitochondrial arginyl- tRNA synthetase gene underlie PCH6. The tRNA splicing endonuclease, the mitochondrial arginyl- tRNA synthetase and the vaccinia related kinase1 are mutated in the minority of PCH1 cases. These genes are involved in essential processes in protein synthesis in general and tRNA processing in particular. In this review we describe the neuroradiological, neuropathological, clinical and genetic features of the different PCH subtypes and we report on in vitro and in vivo studies on the tRNA splicing endonuclease and mitochondrial arginyl-tRNA synthetase and discuss their relation to pontocerebellar hypoplasia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 18%
Other 19 13%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,083
of 2,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,737
of 116,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.