↓ Skip to main content

What is the minimum change in left ventricular ejection fraction, which can be measured with contrast echocardiography?

Overview of attention for article published in Echo Research & Practice, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is the minimum change in left ventricular ejection fraction, which can be measured with contrast echocardiography?
Published in
Echo Research & Practice, June 2018
DOI 10.1530/erp-18-0003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tan Suwatanaviroj, Weimin He, Edith Pituskin, Ian Paterson, Jonathan Choy, Harald Becher

Abstract

There is limited data on what is the minimum change that can be detected in cancer patients undergoing treatment with cardiotoxic drugs who are referred for monitoring left ventricular (LV) function. To assess variability in the measurement of LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in contrast echocardiography and to determine the minimum detectable difference (MDD) between two EF measurements that can be deemed significant. A total of 150 patients were divided into three groups according to EF (EF <53%, 53%-60%, and >60%). Each group consisted of 50 randomly selected cancer patients who underwent contrast echocardiography between July 2010 and May 2014. Repeated measurements of LV volumes and EF were performed offline by a sonographer and a cardiologist. Inter-observer variability was assessed by analysis of variance. Measurement error was estimated by standard error of measurement and MDD. The 95% confidence interval with a single measurement of EF was 2 percentage points in the groups of patients with EF <53% and EF >60%, and 2.5 percentage points for patients with EF 53%-60%. The MDD for EF, end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume that could be recognized with 95% confidence were 4 percentage points, 7 mL and 4 mL, respectively. Contrast echocardiography is a reliable tool for serial measurements of EF to monitor cardiotoxicity due to chemotherapy. In a high-volume echocardiography laboratory with experienced staff, the MDD for EF of 4 percentage points on a good quality recording demonstrates the high reproducibility of the Simpson's method using contrast echocardiography.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 64%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,745,807
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#216
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,445
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.