↓ Skip to main content

10 years of Malaria Journal: how did Open Access change publication patterns?

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
10 years of Malaria Journal: how did Open Access change publication patterns?
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Hommel

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 4%
Pakistan 1 4%
Finland 1 4%
Mexico 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Librarian 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 26%
Computer Science 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,448
of 5,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,165
of 99,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.