↓ Skip to main content

Changing the default for tobacco-cessation treatment in an inpatient setting: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changing the default for tobacco-cessation treatment in an inpatient setting: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2119-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Babalola Faseru, Edward F. Ellerbeck, Delwyn Catley, Byron J. Gajewski, Taneisha S. Scheuermann, Theresa I. Shireman, Laura M. Mussulman, Niaman Nazir, Terry Bush, Kimber P. Richter

Abstract

Most health care providers do not treat tobacco dependence routinely. This may in part be due to the treatment "default." Current treatment guidelines recommend that providers (1) ask patients if they are willing to quit and (2) provide cessation-focused medications and counseling only to smokers who state that they are willing to quit. The default is that patients have to "opt in" to receive cessation assistance: providers ask smokers if they are willing to quit, and only offer medications and cessation support to those who say "yes." This drastically limits the reach of cessation services because, at any given encounter, only one in three smokers say that they are ready to quit. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of providing all smokers with tobacco-cessation treatment unless they refuse it (OPT OUT) versus current practice-screening for readiness and only offering treatment to smokers who say they are ready to quit (OPT IN). This individually randomized clinical trial is conducted in a tertiary-care hospital. We will conduct the trial among up to 1000 randomly selected hospitalized smokers to determine the population impact of changing the treatment default, identify mediators of outcome, and determine the cost-effectiveness of this new, highly proactive approach. This is a population-based study that targets an endpoint of vital interest; applies minimal eligibility criteria to broaden generalizability; and utilizes hospital staff for interventions to ensure long-term sustainability. The study employs delayed consent and an innovative Bayesian adaptive design to evaluate a major shift in our approach to care. If effective, this change would expand the reach of tobacco-cessation treatment from 30% to 100% of smokers. Regardless of outcome, the trial will provide a model of how to alter and evaluate the impact of health care defaults. If OPT OUT proves to be more effective, it will expand the population eligible for cessation treatment by over 300%. It will also simplify the tobacco-cessation treatment algorithm, and relieve busy health care providers of the burden of evaluating readiness to quit. Clinical Trials Registration, ID: NCT02721082 . Registered on 22 March 2016.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 5 5%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 40 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Unspecified 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 45 47%