You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Self-assembled nanoparticles based on modified cationic dipeptides and DNA: novel systems for gene delivery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-11-18 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiban J Panda, Aditi Varshney, Virander S Chauhan |
Abstract |
Gene therapy is most effective when delivery is both efficient and safe. However, it has often proven difficult to find a balance between efficiency and safety in case of viral or polymeric vectors for gene therapy. Peptide based delivery systems may be attractive alternatives but their relative instability to proteolysis is a major concern in realizing their potential application in biomedical sciences. In this work we report gene delivery potential of nanoparticles (Nps) synthesized from cationic dipeptides containing a non-protein amino acid α, β-dehydrophenylalanine (∆Phe) residue. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 35% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 20% |
Chemistry | 9 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#289
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,736
of 196,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.