↓ Skip to main content

How Cold is It? TRPM8 and TRPA1 in the Molecular Logic of Cold Sensation

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Pain, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Cold is It? TRPM8 and TRPA1 in the Molecular Logic of Cold Sensation
Published in
Molecular Pain, April 2005
DOI 10.1186/1744-8069-1-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

David D McKemy

Abstract

Recognition of temperature is a critical element of sensory perception and allows us to evaluate both our external and internal environments. In vertebrates, the somatosensory system can discriminate discrete changes in ambient temperature, which activate nerve endings of primary afferent fibers. These thermosensitive nerves can be further segregated into those that detect either innocuous or noxious (painful) temperatures; the latter neurons being nociceptors. We now know that thermosensitive afferents express ion channels of the transient receptor potential (TRP) family that respond at distinct temperature thresholds, thus establishing the molecular basis for thermosensation. Much is known of those channels mediating the perception of noxious heat; however, those proposed to be involved in cool to noxious cold sensation, TRPM8 and TRPA1, have only recently been described. The former channel is a receptor for menthol, and links the sensations provided by this and other cooling compounds to temperature perception. While TRPM8 almost certainly performs a critical role in cold signaling, its part in nociception is still at issue. The latter channel, TRPA1, is activated by the pungent ingredients in mustard and cinnamon, but has also been postulated to mediate our perception of noxious cold temperatures. However, a number of conflicting reports have suggested that the role of this channel in cold sensation needs to be confirmed. Thus, the molecular logic for the perception of cold-evoked pain remains enigmatic. This review is intended to summarize our current understanding of these cold thermoreceptors, as well as address the current controversy regarding TRPA1 and cold signaling.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 232 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Professor 24 10%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 36 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 18%
Neuroscience 32 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 7%
Chemistry 9 4%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 36 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#190
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,409
of 69,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.