↓ Skip to main content

Differences in estimation of creatinine generation between renal function estimating equations in an Indian population: cross-sectional data from the Hyderabad arm of the Indian migration study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in estimation of creatinine generation between renal function estimating equations in an Indian population: cross-sectional data from the Hyderabad arm of the Indian migration study
Published in
BMC Nephrology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-14-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillippa K Bailey, Charles RV Tomson, Sanjay Kinra, Shah Ebrahim, KV Radhakrishna, Hannah Kuper, Dorothea Nitsch, Yoav Ben-Shlomo

Abstract

Creatinine based formulae for estimating renal function developed in white populations may be less valid in other ethnic groups. We assessed the performance of various estimating formulae in an Indian population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,944,189
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#2,250
of 2,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,078
of 287,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.