↓ Skip to main content

Reduced polyphenol oxidase gene expression and enzymatic browning in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) with artificial microRNAs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduced polyphenol oxidase gene expression and enzymatic browning in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) with artificial microRNAs
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Chi, Basdeo Bhagwat, W David Lane, Guiliang Tang, Yinquan Su, Runcang Sun, B Dave Oomah, Paul A Wiersma, Yu Xiang

Abstract

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), often encoded by a multi-gene family, causes oxidative browning, a significant problem in many food products. Low-browning potatoes were produced previously through suppression of PPO gene expression, but the contribution of individual PPO gene isoform to the oxidative browning process was unknown. Here we investigated the contributions of different PPO genes to total PPO protein activity, and the correlations between PPO protein level, PPO activity and tuber tissue browning potential by suppression of all previously characterized potato PPO genes, both individually and in combination using artificial microRNAs (amiRNAs) technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 38 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 46 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,940,933
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#139
of 3,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,631
of 226,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.