↓ Skip to main content

Increased trend in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use by adults in the United States since 2007

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased trend in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use by adults in the United States since 2007
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1678-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia K. Gerke, Fan Tang, Joseph E. Cavanaugh, Kevin C. Doerschug, Philip M. Polgreen

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly studied as a life support modality, but it is unclear if its use has changed over time. Recent publication shows no significant trend in use of ECMO over time; however, this report does not include more recent data. We performed trend analysis to determine if and when the use of ECMO changed in the past decade. We identified hospitalizations (2000-2011) in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample during which ECMO was recorded. We used a segmented linear regression model to determine trend and to identify a temporal change point when rate of ECMO use increased. ECMO use gradually grew until 2007, at which time there was a dramatic increase in the rate (p = 0.0003). There was no difference in mortality after 2007 (p = 0.3374), but there was longer length of stay (p = 0.0001) and smaller percentage of women (p = 0.005). There has been a marked increase in ECMO use since 2007. As ECMO use becomes more common, further study regarding indications, cost-effectiveness, and outcomes is warranted to guide optimal use.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 65%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%